FNCJan. 3: Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum
When Rick Santorum
essentially tied in Iowa, he gave his campaign new life. He also
guaranteed America would finally learn just how disgusting, vile and
despicable the left is in this country. And how major news outlets and
one of the most well-known businesses in the world – Google – are complicit in trying to destroy Santorum because he opposes gay marriage.
Santorum is the victim of what Reuters partner The Wrap and many other organizations call a “Google problem.” That’s quite the understatement. He was attacked with a Google bomb from Dan Savage,
a gay advocate and sex columnist who hates straight people who don’t
agree with him. He also thinks they should be silenced, bullied and
blackmailed. That’s exactly how he’s treated Santorum.
Savage, in an attempt to destroy Santorum on
the Internet for all time, held a contest in 2003 and asked readers for
the most foul thing they could say to create a new definition for
“Santorum.” The dictionary calls that a neologism and readers gave him 3,000 suggestions.
In practice, what Savage has done is the lowest form of hate speech.
What he picked as a winner is so vile you don’t want to read it or see
it or hear it.
But you have to. It’s the top Google search
term for Santorum, thanks to an extensive lefty campaign to discredit
opponents of gay marriage. To ignore it is to ignore a major issue that
is impacting the presidential campaign. It’s like hiding your eyes in
the face of danger.
Savage has been trying to destroy Santorum
and Google is helping him do it by refusing to adjust the search. The
result leads to the website spreadingSantorum.com, Savage has the following foul definition:
"santorum (san-TOR-um) n. 1. The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex."
That 16 word definition says more about the
left, Google and the major media than any other words ever written.
First, Google, the most dominant search engine on the planet, is a super
tech company worth about $215 billion. Just one share of Google goes
for roughly $666. (Yes, it really does.) One of the company’s guidelines
is “You can make money without doing evil.” You can. They don’t.
Google famously has a complex algorithm set
up to search sites and determine what the most popular hit is for
everything. So Santorum contacted Google and asked for their help. They
gave him the back of their hand and refused to do anything. In repsonse
to questions from left-leaning Politico, a Google “spokesperson said
that Google does not ‘remove content from our search results, except in
very limited cases such as illegal content and violations of our
webmaster guidelines.’” In other words, they do it whenever they feel
like.
“I suspect if something was up there like that about Joe Biden, they’d get rid of it,” Santorum told Politico. “If you're a responsible business, you don't let things like that happen in your business that have an impact on the country.”
The link to the foul Santorum page is there,
but no explanation, apology, nothing. However, when a hate site showed
up prominently as readers searched for “Jew,” Google was quick to respond
by adding a disclaimer. That reads in part: “If you recently used
Google to search for the word ‘Jew,’ you may have seen results that were
very disturbing. We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in
your results are not in any way endorsed by Google.”
And Google, which won’t reveal how it does
its search, is always being manipulated as techies try to figure out how
best to play the Google game. To them, this is just someone playing
that game.
But Google isn’t alone in aiding the attack
on Santorum. ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN have all given cover to
Savage’s monstrous activities. ABC has been the worst, with “Nightline” doing a nearly six-minute puff piece
Correspondent Yunji de Nies said of Savage
“he’s not always nice.” That’s about as understated as saying de Nies
isn’t always a good journalist. In her piece, she mentioned how “Savage
doesn’t hide his politics” and that “he famously went after Republican
Rick Santorum.” But she lacked the courage to explain what Savage did in
detail. That would have damaged Savage’s credibility as an
anti-bullying advocate.
That’s right. Much of her piece, and news
stories at other outlets, focused on how Savage and his male “partner”
have led the “It Gets Better” campaign to discourage bullying of
“lesbian, gay, bi, trans and other bullied teens.” Celebrities and even President Obama
have done videos for the project. None of the reports noted that
Savage, who says he was bullied when he was young, has turned into the
personification of what he claims to hate.
In other words, the anti-bullying advocate
so hailed by the media is also a hypocrite. He disagrees with the very
pledge he claims to support, that “everyone deserves to be respected for
who they are.” Everyone, that is, except Rick Santorum or anyone else
who opposes Savage’s gay agenda.
But he remains a media darling. The New York Times magazine
devoted more than 5,000 words in June to depicting Savage as “old
fashioned” and saying, “Savage’s sex advice puts me in mind of a smart,
tough old grandmother, randy yet stern.”
His fellow lefties embrace Savage, impressed at how witty he is when he tells HBO’s Bill Maher that he wishes Republicans “were all f--king dead.” Or how he thinks “about f--king the s--t out of Rick Santorum.” Maher’s crowd laughed and applauded at that.
And they think his defining attack on Santorum hilarious, even when he resorts to open blackmail. “Saturday Night Live” and Jon Stewart’s
“Daily Show” have both made subtle jokes about the attack. Savage told
Mother Jones that he might take down the Internet campaign against
Santorum for enough cash. “If Rick Santorum wants to make a $5 million
donation to [the gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it
down. Interest starts accruing now.” And Mother Jones' Stephanie
Mencimer had to add a joke. “Santorum may want to consider Savage's
offer. Otherwise, he's kinda screwed.”
This putrid attack isn’t the defining
battle of the 2012 election, but it does show you where different
organizations stand. If Google continues to allow it, it shows it can’t
be trusted with the massive power it has achieved. And no network that
embraces Savage as a commentator or promotes his hypocritical charity
can be taken seriously.
It’s awful to see bullying – especially when news outlets and Google lend a hand.
No comments:
Post a Comment