Obama’s Afghan Policy Is Empowering the Taliban
by
Reps. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) and Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA)
In September 2011 Former President Burhanuddin Rabbani, a key
Northern Alliance leader and the only Tajik to be President of
Afghanistan, was murdered after Taliban emissaries promised to deliver
him an important message of peace. When welcomed, they blew him up.
In August 2011, after a conspiracy that lured in members of our Seal
Team Six with other heroic Americans, the Taliban set up an ambush and
murdered them.
Following those brutal attacks, President Obama’s strategy has been
to hasten negotiations with the Taliban. Additionally, the Obama
administration has now not only offered to release known Taliban
terrorists from detention, but has already released some and
additionally offered to legitimize our sworn enemy by furnishing them a
princely office in Qatar.
In return, Obama’s agents defend that they are being tough on the
Taliban by demanding that they not use the office to raise funds to
support their terrorism. That is a bit reminiscent of the
Clinton-Albright demand of North Korea that if we give them nuclear
technology, they must promise to use it for electric generation and not
weapons.
According to many Afghans, all of these and other Obama
Administration actions give substantial credence to the Taliban claim,
supported privately by some Pakistani leaders, that the U.S. has lost in
Afghanistan and is now begging them for negotiations. One Taliban
leader who was released from detention by the Obama administration for
medical and end of life purposes, is now back in command and recently
demanded on Afghan TV that since the Americans have now lost and are
begging for negotiations, Afghans disloyal to the Taliban must come ask
forgiveness and for safety from the Taliban.
A Northern Alliance leader says that of the more than 800 Taliban
detainees that have been released, he is now seeing many of them
fighting, killing and terrorizing again. Yet, the Northern Alliance
leaders are being effectively shut out of the plans for the way forward,
while being demonized by the American government they helped.
The State Department even went to extraordinary links to attempt
preventing the writers from meeting with the Northern Alliance leaders.
We were able to meet, with some help from foreign friends, but clearly
the Obama administration and its comrades mean for our allies to stay
under the bus when they throw them there.
In late 2001-2002, the Taliban were defeated with less than 500
Americans embedded with the Northern Alliance, but now the Taliban is
stronger while we have more than 100,000 American troops in Afghanistan.
Though Vice-President Biden says the Taliban are not our enemies,
American soldiers in Afghanistan say the Taliban are still creating
IED’s, firing bullets, firing rockets and doing all they can to kill
Americans, so it seemed to them that the Taliban certainly think they
are our enemy. This points straight to the fact our military is not the
problem; its their commander in chief who is the current weak link in
our chain of command.
To date, the U.S. nation-building experiment in Afghanistan has
produced instability, violence, skyrocketing drug production, widespread
corruption, fraudulently rigged elections and the general disapproval
of this new government by its own people. Under the U.S.-approved,
Afghan Constitution, President Karzai appoints all governors for the
provinces, all mayors, police chiefs, the slate for one third of the
Senate candidates, and even a segment of the Class 1 teachers in the
country. He even has power of the purse that the U.S. President does not
have. Clearly this is a formula for heightened corruption, while
isolating and ignoring many ethnic groups that make up the very essence
of Afghan society.
Many with first-hand experience fighting the Taliban say they are
dependent on Pakistan for their marching orders, strategy, and weaponry.
In the meantime, President Karzai’s regime has dropped every pretense
of appreciation for American sacrifice in blood and treasure as
demonstrated by his recent threats to align with Pakistan, Iran and
China even as we continue to prop up his government. From Karzai’s
perspective, he may well see the Taliban and Pakistan as holding his
fate in their hands once the U.S. pulls out.
At the same time, the U.S. is pouring billions of dollars into
Afghanistan that comprises the largest portion of the Afghan
government’s own budget. U.S.A.I.D. alone is pouring $3.6 billion a
year into the country for aid and projects while the money often fails
to get past corrupt government officials with 80 percent going to
Taliban areas and a tiny fraction going to areas where our allies
reside.
The Afghan leaders have become increasingly enriched as their
contempt for us has continued to grow. At President Karzai’s
encouragement, we have politically and militarily undermined the natural
and historic barrier to the Taliban, which is the non-Pashtun peoples
of the North, Central and Western parts of Afghanistan. As these
non-Pashtun communities were weakened, their leaders were undermined by
U.S. support for Karzai and his concentration of power.
The critical next step should be to insist on a new Constitutional
Loya Jirga, or convention, that will draft a new constitution enshrining
federalism as the new form of government. This would break the
Taliban’s ability to dominate Afghanistan by strengthening those
communities opposed to the return of the Taliban and their Al-Qaeda
allies. It would give Afghans the kind of hope that our founders
provided Americans 225 years ago with our Constitution.
We should insist on local elections of Afghan governors and mayors
who may then select the police chiefs. Electing regional leaders would
serve to eliminate the conduit of corruption built into the present
system, while at the same time giving the governing authority back to
the people who are now being disenfranchised.
This course would establish the basis for a political system that
allows each of Afghanistan’s ethnic communities to retain their identity
and protect them from the Taliban’s violent ethnic repression,
brutality and regressive domination. The resulting political framework
would also enable trust and goodwill to be built between Afghanistan’s
diverse communities as each community would have a direct and important
say in its own future.
Perhaps we should even consider support for a Balochistan carved out
of Pakistan to diminish radical power there also. Surely, leaving
Afghanistan to the same terrorist thugs who enabled the September 11th
attacks is the very definition of insanity.The way forward should not
include the current Obama plan of putting our future in Taliban hands
that are covered with American blood
No comments:
Post a Comment