"Now, I agree with the dissent--I would have taken a different course, but the dissent wasn't in the majority. The majority has ruled, and their rule is final," he said.
Romney said he and the Massachusetts legislature described the mandate in his health care law as a penalty.
"Actually, the chief justice in his opinion made it very clear that at the state level, states have the power to put in place mandates. They don't need or require them to be called taxes in order for them to be constitutional, and as a result, Massachusetts' mandate was a mandate, was a penalty, was described that way by the Legislature, and by me, and so it stays as it was," Romney said.
"Whatever it's called--whether it's a penalty, whether it's a tax, it means that Americans--if they don't have insurance--are going to pay something, whatever they call it," said Crawford.
"You know, I made it very clear throughout my campaign, and actually while I was governor of Massachusetts, that the issue of the uninsured should be dealt with at the state level, and each state can create their own solutions to meet the needs of their people," Romney replied.
The Massachusetts health care law, which was enacted in 2006, mandates that every resident obtain a minimum level of health care insurance coverage that is regulated by the state government. It also subsidizes health insurance for people earning up to 300 percent of the poverty level.
According to Romney's web site, he plans to issue an executive order "that paves the way for the federal government to issue Obamacare waivers" to the states on his first day in office and then work with Congress to repeal Obamacare "as quickly as possible." In its place, Romney plans to "pursue policies that give each state the power to craft a health care reform plan that is best for its own citizens."
In his opinion on Obamacare, Chief Justice Roberts conceded that the Obamacare law called the "penalty" for not buying mandated health insurance a "penalty" not a "tax." Having conceded that, Roberts argued in one part of his opinion that this "penalty" should be treated as a "penalty" and in another part that it should be treated as a "tax." He then concluded that it was constitutional for the federal government to force people to buy health insurance so long as they enforced this mandate with a "tax" not a "penalty."