Issa: Obama Admin Ignored Requests for Increased Security in Libya
Today, Reps. Issa and Chaffetz sent a letter to Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton asking why requests for more protection at the Benghazi
embassy were denied. Rep. Issa is the Chairman of the House Oversight
Committee and Rep. Chaffetz is the Chairman of the subcommittee on
National Security, Homeland Defense and Foreign Operations. The full
committee will hold a hearing on October 10, 2012 to assess the security
situation preceding the terrorist attack of September 11.
“Based on information provided to the Committee by individuals with
direct knowledge of events in Libya, the attack that claimed the
ambassador’s life was the latest in a long line of attacks on Western
diplomats and officials in Libya in the months leading up to September
11, 2012. It was clearly never, as Administration officials once
insisted, the result of a popular protest,” the committee’s chairman,
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and subcommittee chairman, Rep. Jason
Chaffetz, R-Utah, write. “In addition, multiple U.S. federal government
officials have confirmed
to the Committee that, prior to the September 11 attack, the U.S.
mission in Libya made repeated requests for increased security in
Benghazi. The mission in Libya, however, was denied these resources by
officials in Washington.”
The letter includes a long list of security concerns that occurred in
Libya in the six months preceding the murder of Ambassador Stevens. Of
particular concern is an attempt on the life of the British Ambassador
that took place on June 10.
June 10, 2012, BENGHAZI – On or about June 10, 2012, a two-car convoy carrying the British Ambassador to Libya from a conference on reforming Libyan military law
was attacked in broad daylight by a militant with an RPG. This attack
was an important escalation in the violence against Western targets in
Benghazi, as prior attacks had been at night and were often preceded by
warnings from the attackers. Photos from the aftermath of the attack
are attached.
The committee has asked the state department to make the appropriate
officials available for the hearing along with answers to the following
questions:
1. Was State Department headquarters in Washington aware of all of the above incidents? If not, why not?
2. If so, what measures did the State Department take to match the
level of security provided to the U.S. Mission in Libya to the level of
threat?
3. Please detail any requests made by Embassy Tripoli to State
Department headquarters for additional security, whether in general or
in light of specific attacks mentioned above. How did the Department
respond to each of those requests?
A copy of the letter can be found
here.
No comments:
Post a Comment